Proxy Season 2024

This year’s proxy season has officially begun. Discover the latest flagged votes and follow updates here.


Major investors demand ambitious methane regulations in the U.S.

13th May 2021

147 investors with $5.35 trillion in assets under management call for stronger methane regulations and enforcement

Inaction will leave investors and oil and gas companies vulnerable to climate and reputational risks

As the Biden administration prepares to revise federal methane regulations, 147 oil and gas industry investors representing $5.35 trillion in assets under management signed on to a statement calling for comprehensive regulations to curb dangerous GHG emissions — and more stringent enforcement mechanisms to back them up.

As “prudent fiduciaries”, the statement says, the signatories believe that virtually eliminating methane emissions supports the financial goals of companies and investors. “By taking action on methane emissions, government can achieve valuable greenhouse gas reductions while helping American industry become cleaner and more competitive,” it continues. In 2019, U.S. oil and gas operations emitted 16 million metric tons of methane emissions, with a near-term climate impact greater than all U.S. coal-fired power plants.

The debate is not whether there should be methane regulations, it’s about how strong the methane regulations should be and how strongly they should be enforced. Investors and companies have a responsibility to help ensure that methane is properly regulated.

Brian Rice, portfolio manager, CalSTRS

Among the signatories include Allianz SE, CalSTRS, Legal & General Investment Management and Wespath Benefits and Investments. Read the full statement and complete list of signatories here.

In a first-day executive order, President Biden tasked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with considering and proposing, by September 2021, new performance standards and emissions guidelines for methane and volatile organic compounds emitted by the oil and gas industry. Through their statement, the investors called on the EPA to set a much stronger standard with mandatory regulations that apply to both existing and future infrastructure.

The statement specifically urges the EPA to set regulations that will:

  • Address the full scope of all possible industry emissions, including inactive or abandoned wells
  • Provide frequent monitoring to ensure rapid detection and mitigation of leaks
  • Minimize venting and flaring
  • Support development and deployment of innovative technologies for methane mitigation
  • Achieve ambitious emission reductions in a reasonably cost-effective manner

We favour strong methane regulations, which are widely supported across the market. Given technological advances, they should be low-cost to introduce and offer potentially significant benefits for society. By contrast, continuing to have a weak regulatory framework risks both the industry’s social license and shareholder value, in our view.

Alexander Burr, ESG policy lead at Legal & General Investment Management

Methane, the main component of natural gas, is 84 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over the 20 years after its release. Researchers estimate that methane from human actions is responsible for at least a quarter of today’s warming, and addressing emissions from oil and gas operations offers one of the easiest and most cost-effective ways to meet U.S. climate goals. Methane-related emissions exacerbate respiratory illness and contribute to ground-level ozone and smog, increasing the risk of heart disease. These impacts hit industry workers and those living nearby to well pads and fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations and communities of color.

There is a strong business case for setting high standards on methane emissions in the oil and gas sector. Ultimately, ambitious standards will benefit all stakeholders—investors, businesses, communities and the environment.

Luan Jenifer, president, Miller/Howard Investments

Regulations would actually help, not harm, oil and gas companies, according to the statement. A 75% reduction in global methane emissions is possible with current technology, and up to 40% of emissions could be mitigated at no net cost. Many major oil and gas companies including Jonah, Pioneer, BP and Shell have already spoken out in favor of methane regulation.

Voluntary commitments alone have not achieved meaningful reductions. Many companies lag behind industry targets, the statement explains, while mandatory regulations would provide adequate tools and incentives, as they level the playing field. Satellite technology able to detect methane leaks to a granularity of 100 square meters, including MethaneSAT and Carbon Mapper, is expected to come on line in the next two years and will make emissions detection much more effective, supporting regulatory efforts and presenting further risk for companies.

Insufficient regulatory clarity on methane emissions is a risk to investors and businesses. Improved regulations will ensure that all companies operate on a level playing field, while helping to insulate them from possible reputational risk.

Mary Jane McQuillen, head of ESG investment and portfolio Manager at ClearBridge Investments

Whether methane escapes through venting, flares or leaks, it represents lost product and  earnings for oil and gas companies, a stated concern for the investors. Additionally, weak U.S. regulations could potentially damage future domestic natural gas companies’ export opportunities as foreign governments impose standards aligned with a net-zero economy.

There are thousands of independent oil and gas companies across the country operating millions of wells, to say nothing of the more-than three million orphaned wells that can continue to leach methane into the atmosphere. Without strong regulations and a level playing field, some companies will continue to perform poorly, and as larger companies spin off old assets to smaller operators, the likelihood of leaks and fugitive emissions will increase. Without methane reductions, the climate math will not work for us to reach critical targets, locally or globally. It’s that simple.

Andrew Logan, senior director of oil and gas at Ceres

The statement’s signatories were coordinated by Ceres and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR). It represents another step in a decade-long effort by investors to press for effective methane regulation at the federal and state levels.

ICCR has worked with investors for well over a decade on the negative impacts of hydraulic fracturing operations on local communities. The climate and health risks posed by unnecessary methane leakage has been central to our engagements with companies and regulators since 2015, when the Obama EPA first proposed meaningful regulation of this potent greenhouse gas. According to a recent U.N. report, the biggest opportunity for reducing methane lies in the fossil fuel sector, with cuts of about 60 percent possible in oil and gas emissions over the next decade. Strong methane regulations are needed now.

Christina Herman, program director for climate change & environmental justice at ICCR (Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility)

About Ceres

Ceres is a nonprofit organization working with the most influential capital market leaders to solve the world’s greatest sustainability challenges. Through our powerful networks and global collaborations of investors, companies and nonprofits, we drive action and inspire equitable market-based and policy solutions throughout the economy to build a just and sustainable future. For more information, visit and follow @CeresNews.

About ICCR

Currently celebrating its 50th year, ICCR is the pioneer coalition of shareholder advocates who view the management of their investments as a catalyst for social change. Its 300-plus member organizations comprise faith communities, socially responsible asset managers, unions, pensions, NGOs and other socially responsible investors with combined assets of over US$4 trillion. ICCR members engage hundreds of corporations annually in an effort to foster greater corporate accountability. Visit our website and follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook.


Aargauische Pensionskasse (APK)
Adrian Dominican Sisters, Portfolio Advisory Board
Allianz Global Investors
Allianz SE
Arjuna Capital
As You Sow
ATISA Personalvorsorgestiftung der Tschümperlin-Unternehmungen
Baldwin Brothers LLC
BC Municipal Pension Plan
Bernische Lehrerversicherungskasse
Bernische Pensionskasse BPK
Bon Secours Mercy Health
Boston Common Asset Management
Boston Trust Walden
British Columbia Investment Management Corporation
Caisse Cantonale d’Assurance Populaire – CCAP
Caisse de pension du Comité international de la Croix-Rouge
Caisse de pension Hewlett-Packard Plus
Caisse de pensions de l’Etat de Vaud (CPEV)
Caisse de pensions du CERN
Caisse de pensions du personnel communal de Lausanne (CPCL)
Caisse de pensions ECA-RP
Caisse de prév. des Fonctionnaires de Police & des Etablissements Pénitentiaires Caisse de Prévoyance de l’Etat de Genève CPEG
Caisse de Prévoyance des Interprètes de Conférence (CPIC)
Caisse de prévoyance du personnel communal de la ville de Fribourg
Caisse de prévoyance du personnel de l’Etat de Fribourg (CPPEF)
Caisse de prévoyance du personnel de l’Etat du Valais (CPVAL)
Caisse intercommunale de pensions (CIP)
Caisse paritaire de prévoyance de l’industrie et de la construction (CPPIC) CalSTRS
CAP Prévoyance
Capricorn Investment Group
Change Finance
Chrysalix EVC
Church Investment Group
CIEPP – Caisse Inter-Entreprises de Prévoyance Professionnelle
ClearBridge Investments
Committee on Mission Responsibility Through Investment of the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Congregation of Sisters of St. Agnes
Congregation of St. Joseph
Corporate Responsibility office – Province of Saint Joseph of the Capuchin Order Dana Investment Advisors
Daughters of Charity, Province of St. Louise
Dominican Sisters ~ Grand Rapids
Dominican Sisters of Sparkill
Earth Equity Advisors
Encourage Capital
Etablissement Cantonal d’Assurance (ECA VAUD)
Ethos Foundation
Everence and the Praxis Mutual Funds
EverHope Capital
Figure 8 Investment Strategies
First Affirmative Financial Network
Fondation de la métallurgie vaudoise du bâtiment (FMVB) Fondation de prévoyance Artes & Comoedia
Fondation de prévoyance du Groupe BNP PARIBAS en Suisse Fondation de prévoyance professionnelle en faveur de AROMED Fondation de prévoyance Romande Energie
Fondation Interprofessionnelle Sanitaire de Prévoyance (FISP) Fondation Leenaards
Fondation Patrimonia
Fonds de Prévoyance de CA Indosuez (Suisse) SA
Fonds interprofessionnel de prévoyance (FIP)
Friends Fiduciary Corporation
Gebäudeversicherung Luzern
Gebäudeversicherung St. Gallen
Hexavest Impact Investors
Impax Asset Management LLC
Jesuit Committee on Investment Responsibility
LACERA – Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association Leadership Team of the Felician Sisters of North America Legal & General Investment Management
Local Authority Pension Fund Forum
Luzerner Pensionskasse
Mennonite Education Agency
Mercy Investment Services, Inc.
Miller/Howard Investments, Inc.
Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate JPIC Office
Natural Investments
NEI Investments
Nest Sammelstiftung
Neumeier Poma Investment Counsel, LLC
New York City Office of the Comptroller
New York State Common Retirement Fund
Northwest Coalition for Responsible Investment
Office of the Vermont State Treasurer
Pensionskasse Römisch-katholische Landeskirche des Kantons Luzern Pensionskasse AR
Pensionskasse Bank CIC (Schweiz)
Pensionskasse Basel-Stadt
Pensionskasse Bühler AG Uzwil
Pensionskasse Caritas
Pensionskasse der Basler Kantonalbank
Pensionskasse der Stadt Frauenfeld
Pensionskasse der Stadt Winterthur
Pensionskasse Pro Infirmis
Pensionskasse Schaffhausen
Pensionskasse SRG SSR
Pensionskasse Stadt Luzern
Pensionskasse Stadt St. Gallen
Pensionskasse Unia
Personalvorsorgekasse der Stadt Bern
Prévoyance Santé Valais (PRESV)
Profelia Fondation de prévoyance
Prosperita Stiftung für die berufliche Vorsorge
Quantum Energy Partners
Raiffeisen Pensionskasse Genossenschaft
Region VI Coalition for Responsible Investment
Rentes Genevoises
Reynders, McVeigh Capital Management
RP – Fonds institutionnel
RRSE (Regroupement pour la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises) School Sisters of Notre Dame Cooperative Investment Fund Secunda Sammelstiftung
Seventh Generation Interfaith Inc
Signet Strategic Wealth Management, Inc.
Silicz Wealth Management Team
Sisters of Bon Secours USA
Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill Philadelphia, PA Sisters of St Dominic Racine, WI
Sisters of St. Dominic of Caldwell
Sisters of St. Francis
Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia
Sisters of St. Joseph of Springfield
Sisters of the Humility of Mary
Sisters of the Presentation of the BVM of Aberdeen SD St. Galler Pensionskasse
Stiftung Abendrot
SVA Zürich
Terre des hommes Schweiz
The Episcopal Church (DFMS)
The Pension Boards-UCC, Inc.
Trillium Asset Management
Unfallversicherungskasse des Basler Staatspersonals Unitarian Universalist Association
Université de Genève (UNIGE)
Verein Barmherzige Brüder von Maria-Hilf (Schweiz) Vermont Pension Investment Committee
Vorsorge SERTO
Wespath Benefits and Investments